πŸ“’ Actions Speak Louder Than Words!

↩️ Reply to:
https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/pull/22262

Posted: Oct 24, 2021 | Reading time: 1 min
πŸ“’ I’ve moved to a new website. Please visit me at https://journal.robbi.my !
reply

Origin:

New issue on project "dotnet/sdk/pull/22262"

My reply:

Faith in humanity Hot reload have been restored!


πŸ”€ Syndicated to:

Edit

Have some thoughts, discussion or feedback on this post?
IndieWeb Interactions

Below you can find the interactions that this page has had using Indieweb. Which means, you can mentioned this URL on any website that support WebMention. Have you written a response to this post? Let me know the URL:

((Do you use a website that do not set up with WebMention capabilities? You can use Comment Parade.)


Comments and replies

  • πŸ’¬ Pinox: To those involved in reverting , thank you. Read on some blog the reason for this is that VS should have this feature at the expense of the SDK and various other company politics at play. Strange thing is I use dotnet watch all the time with VS ( I do not use other code editor). So dotnet watch is hugely complimentary for my workflow with VS and it makes no sense to remove this feature as it will make me less productive in VS. Whoever the exec that took this decision do not understand modern software development. If this is the same exec that decided **against upgrading UWP to .NET 5/6** then I would argue it's time that this person takes some well deserved garden leave.